Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Mathis v. USA
as 1:2015cv02376
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jimmy Thomas Mathis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MATHIS v. USA
as 2:2015cv01525
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAY GREGORY MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WALKER v. MATHIS et al
as 2:2015cv05134
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Defendant:
SHANDA MATHIS, KERRY KERSCHNER, CYNTHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv05109
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WRIGHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 2:2015cv03584
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, SARA B. SAMSON and COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
HYSENI v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
SAHAR HYSENI
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHRISTOPHER IYOOB, ANDREA MATHIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MATHIS et al v. PATHMARK STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00369
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MATHIS and PATRICIA MATHIS
Defendant:
PATHMARK STORES, INC. and THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOWERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06356
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FLOWERS , JUDAH WILLIAMS , BRADY FLOYD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATHIS v. BOARD OF PUC et al
as 2:2014cv05651
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant:
BOARD OF PUC, PUBLIC UTILITY COMM, PECO S PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
MATHIS v. MATHIS et al
as 2:2014cv05089
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant:
FRANCINE MATHIS, BELIZAIRE and MIRJANE BELIZAIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
