Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Maxwell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01703
Plaintiff:
Jerene Maxwell and Eh Maxwell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chilton et al v. Chilton et al
as 2:2012cv02090
Plaintiff:
William Ruffner Chilton and Cynthia Chilton Wilson
Defendant:
Robert Maxwell Chilton , Alice Chilton Zuber , United Bank, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv01694
Plaintiff:
Linda Maxwell
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Seneca Trustees, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Maxwell et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
Karen Maxwell and Chester Maxwell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Covidien Inc. , Covidien plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell et al v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
Velma K. Maxwell and George L. Maxwell
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell v. Cross
as 1:2010cv00098
Petitioner:
Bryan Maxwell
Respondent:
James N Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maxwell v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01039
Petitioner:
Sebert J. Maxwell, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Key v. State of WV et al
as 3:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jerry Melvin Key
Defendant:
State of WV, Jack Alsop, Randolph County Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Riley (Bey) v. Maxwell
as 5:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
Aaron Keith Riley (Bey)
Defendant:
Robert Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
