Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Bailey v. Toman et al
as 5:2013cv00448
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
William C. Toman, Jr., R. M. Ashley, K. D. Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCLAUGHLIN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00621
Plaintiff:
JEROME MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
McLaughlin v. USA
as 3:2011cv00197
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jovan Marquell McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gevara v. Bennett et al
as 3:2010cv00354
Petitioner:
Jorge Gevara
Respondent:
Boyd Bennett, Robert C. Lewis, Alvin W. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Patel v. Tucker-Hill et al
as 5:2010ct03091
Plaintiff:
Kamal Patel
Defendant:
Hee Haw Tucker-Hill, Ms. Adcocks, Abdur Rahim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BULLARD et al v. SCOTLAND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, et al
as 1:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
ALYSSA JASMINE BULLARD and SHARON BULLARD
Defendant:
SCOTLAND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, SCOTLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., GENE MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Medical Malpractice
Montgomery v. Beck et al
as 5:2009ct03029
Plaintiff:
Gerald Young Montgomery
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, James E. Langston, Anthony G. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FORDHAM v. JONES
as 1:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
CHRIS FORDHAM
Defendant:
JONES, SHUMAN, NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McLaughlin v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2007cv00383
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. McLaughlin
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County DSS, The State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
