Cases 41 - 50 of 554
SCHWOEPPE v. MITCHELL
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. SCHWOEPPE, JR.
Defendant:
DAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EATON v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
ARSENIO L. EATON
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, DANIKA MITCHELL, WYRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON et al v. CITY OF MITCHELL et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JACKSON, AJ, CJ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MITCHELL, LAWRENCE COUNTY INDIANA, LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOYERS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv06994
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHEL MOYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MITCHELL v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
LARRY MITCHELL
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. INDIANAPOLIS METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
DAVID JASON TAYLOR
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, RYAN GOOTEE, MOSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. USA
as 1:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
Calvin Mitchell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
