Cases 41 - 50 of 273
Vick v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Delanio Maurice Vick
Defendant:
USP Marion, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Roger Pace
Defendant:
USP Marion, Warden Sprout and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Canady v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01537
Plaintiff:
Raevaughn Canady
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. United States Penitentiary Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01497
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pemberton v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01458
Plaintiff:
Devin A. Pemberton
Defendant:
USP Marion, FBOP and Warden Sprout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkins v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01459
Plaintiff:
Harold Perkins
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. McAuliffe et al
as 1:2021cv06061
Plaintiff:
Marion Thomas
Defendant:
Daniel McAuliffe, Michael Botica, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Kennedy #3206 et al
as 1:2021cv05987
Plaintiff:
Marion Johnson and Latisha Johnson-Golden
Defendant:
Officer William Kennedy #3206, Officer Pawel Swierczynski #7974, Officer Rebecca Tidei #19359 and others
Intervenor:
C.Norris Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marion v. Sheriff Office (Cook County) et al
as 1:2021cv05950
Plaintiff:
Areon Marion
Defendant:
Sheriff Office (Cook County), Cook County Department of Corrections, Roti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Marion v. Ball et al
as 3:2021cv01351
Plaintiff:
City of Marion
Defendant:
Dennis Ball, MidCountry Bank, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
