Cases 41 - 50 of 777
DODSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14382
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY DODSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Swanson v. United States
as 6:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Thompson v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Thompson
Defendant:
State of Utah, Garfield County Jail and Garfield County Sheriff
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Danielson
as 6:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant:
Kevin Danielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BURRIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY BURRIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
United States v. Michael Davis
as 23-1872
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Ray Davis, also known as Mikey Davis
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Wright v. USA
as 6:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
