Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
QUARLES et al v. LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC PROMOTION LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
INA SCHNITZER, KIMBERLY COZZENS, TINA QUARLES and others
Defendant:
LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC PROMOTION LLC doing business as DISCO RODEO and CARLOS GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wright v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2022ct03211
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Lassiter, Todd E. Ishee, Shelia Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Bond
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Monica Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Bonds
as 1:2022cv00127
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Monica Bonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Bonds
as 1:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Monica Bonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobham v. Holland Square Group, LLC
as 3:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Monica Cobham
Defendant:
Holland Square Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Monica Garrett
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
