Cases 41 - 50 of 509
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, et al
as 1:2022cv02505
Defendant:
Maryland, Grace Communion International, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and others
Plaintiff:
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC, Christina J. Bostick, C.B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Ana Martinez v. Netflix, Inc., et al
as 23-10895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA MARGARITA MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., OLIVIER ASSAYAS and ORANGE STUDIOS, S.A.
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Netflix, Inc. v. Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limite
as 23-1836
Appellant:
NETFLIX, INC.
Appellee:
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limite v. Netflix, Inc.
as 23-1817
Appellant:
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Cross Appellant:
NETFLIX, INC.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd. v. Netflix, Inc.
as 23-1815
Appellant:
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC.
Francisco Ferrero Rodriguez v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ferreras Rodriguez
Defendant:
Netflix Inc., Nolita Cinema, David M Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd. v. Netflix, Inc.
as 23-1750
Appellant:
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC.
Xu Zhang v. Netflix, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Xu Zhang
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
