Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Nale et al v. City of Georgetown IL et al
as 2:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
Shelly F. Nale and Melissa J. bowles
Defendant:
City of Georgetown IL, Kay Sanders, Carl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nale et al v. City of Georgetown et al
as 2:2014cv02078
Plaintiff:
Shelly F Nale and Melissa J Bowles
Defendant:
City of Georgetown, Kay Sanders, Carl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walbrook v. Nale et al
as 1:2014cv00725
Defendant:
Blake, John Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walbrook v. Nale et al
as 1:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Robert Walbrook
Defendant:
V. Deb Nale, Blake, Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05687
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rico v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2013cv01583
Plaintiff:
Ellinor Rico
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Brian Koehn, Unknown Koehn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nale v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-17391
Plaintiff:
Carla Jean Nale
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Tieman v. City of Newburgh et al
as 1:2013cv04178
Plaintiff:
Steven Tieman
Defendant:
City of Newburgh, Joseph Palermo, John Maguire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tieman v. City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2013cv04178
Plaintiff:
Steven Tieman
Defendant:
City of Newburgh, Joseph Palermo, John Maguire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gress v. Smith, et al.
as 2:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Gress
Defendant:
Christopher Smith, Stephen Tseng, Brett Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
