Cases 41 - 50 of 1,764
NEPHEW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06288
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL NEPHEW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guzman v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Guzman
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawks v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Hawks
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Mira v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2022cv01135
Plaintiff:
Carla M Mira
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Mellgren v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01078
Defendant:
Deborah Mellgren and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
De Gaudemar et al v. Kosinski et al
as 1:2022cv03534
Plaintiff:
Belinda De Gaudemar, Anthony Hoffman, Susan Schoenfeld and others
Defendant:
Peter S. Kosinski, Douglas A. Kellner, Andrew J. Spano and others
Interested Party:
Tim Harkenrider, Guy C. Brought, Lawrence Canning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfe v. Smith and Nephew, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Shirley Wolfe
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc. and The Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Tyler v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Harold Tyler
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romesburg et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Nathan Romesburg and Kristen Romesburg
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paula Redick v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 22-1299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAULA P. REDICK
Plaintiff:
JACE D. REDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., a Tennessee Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
