Cases 41 - 50 of 82
NC NAACP State Conference v. Philip Berger
as 19-2273
Appellant:
PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP, HIGH POINT NAACP and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, DAVID C. BLACK, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Harper, et al v. Lewis, et al
as 5:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RUSH, JOHN BALLA, KATHLEEN BARNES and others
Defendant:
DAVID C BLACK, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KENNETH RAYMOND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, PAUL NEWTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CO-CHAIR OF THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON REDISTRICTING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Philip Berger v. NC State Conference of NAACP
as 19-2048
Appellant:
PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP, HIGH POINT NAACP and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, DAVID C. BLACK, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 5:2019cv00248
Plaintiff:
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
North Carolina State Board of Elections and Karen Brinson Bell
Norton v. Columbus County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Harold Fipps, Jerome McMillian, Columbus County Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Interested Party:
Stella Anderson, Bob Cordle, David Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, NC
as 19-1291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT HORVATH, DANNY BLACKWELL, Council Member, THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, and/or their successors and others
Common Cause et al v. Representative David R. Lewis et al
as 5:2018cv00589
Plaintiff:
REBECCA JOHNSON, PAULA ANN CHAPMAN, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, Joshua Malcolm, RALPH E HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronald Calvin Williams v. NC State Board of Elections
as 17-2367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CALVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Roy Cooper, Governor and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT SECRETARY OF STATE, Elaine Marshall, Secretary
Russell Walker v. Hoke County Board of Election
as 17-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL F. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
