Cases 41 - 50 of 342
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Fleming et al v. SMITH
as 2:2021cv05446
Plaintiff:
Georgette Fleming and Tasheeba Fleming-Moore
Defendant:
CHAD SMITH and P/O CHAD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSTELL v. RAY et al
as 2:2021cv05146
Plaintiff:
JULIUS POSTELL
Defendant:
P/O MARQUISE RAY, P/O PAUL MOORE IV, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COHAN v. BOLOGNA et al
as 2:2021cv04328
Plaintiff:
CAYLEY COHAN
Defendant:
INSPECTOR JOSEPH BOLOGNA, P/O LEZLIE WINTERS and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv15677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
GREENE et al v. LANCE et al
as 3:2021cv14399
Plaintiff:
DYNAJAH GREENE and CARRIE STEPNEY
Defendant:
P/O WILLIAM LANCE, POLICE CHIEF ROBERT STETTNER and TOWN OF PHILLIPSBURG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vergara v. U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Respondent:
P. O. Shekevia C. Hawkins, U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA, P. O. Francean Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Hernando Javier Vergara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vergara v. U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA et al
as 1:2021cv02261
Respondent:
P. O. Shekevia C. Hawkins, U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA and P. O. Francean Jackson
Petitioner:
Hernando Javier Vergara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAMILTON v. GUGGER et al
as 2:2021cv01970
Defendant:
KEVIN SLOAN, DOMINIC O'NEILL, C/O CHAD GUGGER and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE T. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff:
CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
