Cases 41 - 50 of 67
RICHARD et al v. JOLLIE et al
as 2:2011cv01075
Petitioner:
THOMAS P. RICHARD, SR.
Respondent:
BARBARA JOLLIE, JUDI PETRUSH, MICHAEL PACEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALDWELL v. THE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AGENCY et al
as 2:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant:
THE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AGENCY, JOHN WETZEL, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARVEY v. KING et al
as 2:2011cv00558
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN GARVEY
Defendant:
KEITH A. KING, GALVANEK, BEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PECK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57418
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PECK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PECK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57119
Plaintiff:
PAUL A PECK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LAUGHLIN v. PECK et al
as 1:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LAUGHLIN
Defendant:
PECK, DAVID SMITH, KIRK HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PECK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03324
Plaintiff:
PHILIP PECK
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BISHOP v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANI D.A. JOHN PECK et al
as 2:2010cv00465
Petitioner:
IAN A. BISHOP
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANI D.A. JOHN PECK, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS JEFFREY BEARD and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PECK v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93194
Plaintiff:
LEROY F. PECK and LEROY F. PECK
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD, ARMSTRONG WORLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PECK v. BUREAU OF COLLECTION RECOVERY, INC.
as 2:2009cv04381
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH PECK
Defendant:
BUREAU OF COLLECTION RECOVERY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
