Cases 41 - 50 of 56
USA v. Pedro Rivera
as 11-12212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO JESUS RIVERA
Rivera v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2011cv00152
Petitioner:
Pedro Nieves Rivera
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pedro Rivera v. TX State Bd of Med Examiner
as 11-50030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO IVAN RIVERA, also known as Pedro I. Rivera, also known as Pedro I Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
Rivera-Rodriguez et al v. Antares Oil Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv02214
Plaintiff:
Efrain Rivera-Rodriguez , Dinelia Suarez-Santos , Bernardo Febus-Coriano and others
Defendant:
Antares Oil Services, LLC, Repsol Petroleo, S.A., MAPFRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORALES-RAMIREZ et al v. INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv07031
Plaintiff:
NESTOR MORALES-RAMIREZ , CARLOS SUAREZ-BLANDON , FELICIANO RUIZ-VALENCIA and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL RESOURCES, INC. and THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL GLAH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Rivera v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners
as 1:2010cv00912
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ivan Rivera
Defendant:
Texas State Board of Medical Examiners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
RIVERA v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv02045
Plaintiff:
PEDRO IVAN RIVERA
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and MICHAEL J. MOREL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
RIVERA v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
as 1:2010cv01856
Plaintiff:
PEDRO IVAN RIVERA
Defendant:
TEXAS STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72373
Plaintiff:
PEDRO M. RIVERA
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
