Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Gadson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00914
Plaintiff:
Robert Vincent Gadson
Defendant:
United States of America, CEO Federal Reserve Bank, Board of Fed Gov DC HQ Fed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAUSEY v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2009cv04296
Petitioner:
JAMAL CAUSEY
Respondent:
JOHN THOMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA. PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREGG v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2009cv03514
Petitioner:
REGINALD GREGG
Respondent:
KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA. PA. LYNN ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENN. TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYWARD v. SMEALS et al
as 2:2009cv02616
Petitioner:
YUL B. HAYWARD
Respondent:
PAUL S. SMEALS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA., PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Brett v. George Bush
as 09-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE BUSH, President, ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, MONICA MARIE GOODLING and others
Brett v. Bush et al
as 1:2008cv02234
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
George Bush, Alberto Gonzalez, Monica Goodling and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NIEVES v. PENSYLVANIN BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2008cv03735
Plaintiff:
SERAFIN NIEVES
Defendant:
PENSYLVANIN BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, CATHERINE C. MCVEY, RACHEL SPRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAYWARD v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv04092
Petitioner:
YUL B. HAYWARD
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA., PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
