Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Andrade v. Amarillo Police Department and Police Officers et al
as 2:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Brent Huckabay Law Firm, PLLC, Steven J Deal, Cameron Kent Camarillo and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Valdez Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrade v. Amarillo Police Department and Police Officers et al
as 2:2019cv00152
Defendant:
Potter County Sheriff Department an Staff, Nancy Esparza, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Valdez Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Dunn v. Texas Governor, et al
as 18-50632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS GOVERNOR, TEXAS TRIAL JUDGES, TEXAS COUNTY COURTS and others
Dunn v. Texas Governor et al
as 6:2018cv00182
Defendant:
GRANBURY TX., HOOD COUNTY, EL PASO TX., EL PASO COUNTY, HOUSTON, TX. HARRIS COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Briggs v. Potter County et al
as 4:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ralph Briggs, Sr.
Defendant:
Potter County, Glenn Drake, II, Susan Kefover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pernell Robinson, Jr. v. Young, et al
as 17-10087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERNELL ROBINSON, JR., also known as Pernell Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
NFN YOUNG, Officer, MAIL ROOM and POTTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Robinson v. Lemmon et al
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Pernell Robinson
Defendant:
NFN Lemmon, Potter County Detention Center and NFN Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Young et al
as 2:2016cv00265
Plaintiff:
Pernell Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Young, Mail Room and Potter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Potter County et al
as 4:2016cv01729
Plaintiff:
Roy Hunt
Defendant:
Potter County , Glenn C. Drake, II , Susan Kefover and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
