Cases 41 - 50 of 111
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Lufkin v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2017cv02513
Plaintiff:
Paul Robert Lufkin
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Mers, Inc. and Nationstar Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paul Roberts v. N. Persona
as 5:2017cv01301
Defendant:
Huete, Huete, A. Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Roberts
Pickens v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv01328
Petitioner:
Paul Robert Pickens
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. USA
as 3:2017cv01049
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Krzeminski, et al v. City of Buffalo, et al
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Michael Krzeminski and David Durmaj
Defendant:
The City of Buffalo, Jako Mondal, Joshua Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davison v. State Administration Proceeding et al
as 1:2016cv06594
Plaintiff:
Clyde Davison, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul Robert, Krista Roberts and State Administration Proceeding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davison v. State Administration Proceeding et al
as 1:2016cv08616
Plaintiff:
Clyde Davison, Jr.
Defendant:
State Administration Proceeding, Krista Roberts and Paul Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Roberts v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2016cv01929
Defendant:
D. Borders, D. Borders, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Roberts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
