Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Gonzalez-Torres v. Newson et al
as 3:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gonzalez-Torres
Defendant:
John F. Newson, Chivvers, Couto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. UConn Health et al
as 3:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gonzalez Torres
Defendant:
UConn Health, Department of Correction, John Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Mandry-Mercado
as 16-2518
Petitioner:
JAVIER E. MANDRY-MERCADO
Respondent:
VANESSA LUGO-OBJIO, CONSEJO DE TITULARES CONDOMINIO EL SENORIAL, MANUEL ZENGOTITA, Former President of HOA and others
Pedro Gonzalez-Campos v. USA
as 16-17290
Petitioner - Appellant:
PEDRO GONZALEZ-CAMPOS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Francisco Rangel Gonzalez
as 16-20502
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO PEDRO RANGEL GONZALEZ, also known as Fransicso Rangel-Gonzales, also known as Frankie Rangel, also known as Fray Pedro Gonzalez
Blank v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
David Vern Blank
Defendant:
William Stephens, Pedro Gonzalez, Monte Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Pedro Gonzalez-Campos
as 16-14786
Petitioner:
In re: PEDRO GONZALEZ-CAMPOS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Confederacion Hipica de Puerto Rico, Inc. et al v. Confederacion de Jinetes Puertorriquenos, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02256
Plaintiff:
Confederacion Hipica de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Camarero Racetrack Corp.
Defendant:
Confederacion de Jinetes Puertorriquenos, Inc. , Asociacion de Jinetes de Puerto Rico, Inc. , Abner Adorno and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Pedro Roman
as 16-14544
Petitioner:
In re: PEDRO GONZALEZ ROMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gonzalez-Campos v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv22641
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gonzalez-Campos
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
