Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vielma, Artemio v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. et al
as 5:2010cv00099
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. , Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc and Lopez, Lucy
Plaintiff:
Artemio Vielma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratcliff et al v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe, & Jack of Delaware, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv12865
Plaintiff:
Tonica Ratcliff and Adam Ratcliff
Defendant:
Pep Boys-Manny, Moe, & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pepboys Auto
Garza v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00365
Plaintiff:
Rene Garza
Defendant:
Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Varner v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01020
Plaintiff:
Loretta N. Varner
Defendant:
Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. and John L. Clark
Cross Claimant:
Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc.
Cross Defendant:
John L. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cone v. Acgo Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv00394
Defendant:
American Biltrite Inc., United Gilsonite Laboratories, Bird, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arletta Cone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abdullah v. Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc.
as 1:2009cv10696
Defendant:
Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and American Products Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aneesah Abdullah and Muhommed Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
