Cases 41 - 50 of 76
John v. Medina
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
Patrick R John
Defendant:
Marina Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomson & Pratt Insurance Assoc., Inc. v. Praetorian Insurance Company
as 1:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Thomson & Pratt Insurance Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Praetorian Insurance Company and R. John Pratt
Counter_claimant:
Praetorian Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Thomson & Pratt Insurance Associates, Inc. and R. John Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arizona Green Party et al v. Bennett et al
as 2:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
Arizona Green Party and Claudia Ellquist
Defendant:
Ken Bennett , LeNora Johnson, Jim Claw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP et al
as 1:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Donna Taylor and Dale Miesen
Defendant:
Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP, Gary Babbitt, Richard Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earnest Woods, II v. Tom Carey, et al
as 10-16741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM L. CAREY, D. R. JOHNS, CERVANTES and others
Mailliard King v. T. Carey, et al
as 10-15720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAILLIARD LUCIEN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
T. L. CAREY, D. K. SISTO, C. D. BROWN and others
John R. Johns, et al. v. Acands Inc, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72976
Plaintiff:
John R. Johns
Defendant:
Acands Inc
John R. Johns, et al. v. Acands Inc, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72977
Plaintiff:
John R. Johns
Defendant:
Acands Inc
John R. Johns, et al. v. Acands Inc, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72978
Plaintiff:
John R. Johns
Defendant:
Acands Inc
JOHNS et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv72978
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE R. JOHNS and JOHN R. JOHNS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
