Cases 41 - 50 of 200
Mitzner v. Smith et al
as 3:2021xc00216
Defendant:
Daniel S Klein, Ronald David Smith, Daniel B Jackson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Douglas R Salisbury
Plaintiff:
Matthew M Mitzner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRINCE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01780
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID PRINCE JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivers v. Saul
as 3:2020cv09485
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
ADAMS v. PERRY et al
as 5:2020cv00435
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HARRIS, JOHN DOE, WARDEN CLINTON PERRY and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv04498
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Stevens, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES v. GADSDEN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL et al
as 4:2020cv00497
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant:
GADSDEN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL and PAMELA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Adams v. Benjamin Ford
as 20-13641
Respondent / Appellee:
BENJAMIN FORD
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD DAVID ADAMS
DAVIS v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv04307
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
RONALD DAVID and RONALD DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRIFFITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58021
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55038
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
