Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Pettiford-Bey v. Merold et al
as 5:2015ct03213
Plaintiff:
Chilean Pettiford-Bey
Defendant:
Bryce R. Merold, Raleigh Police Department, Jennifer M. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2015ct03024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department, Wake County and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colvin v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
Eric Colvin
Defendant:
City of Raleigh , Raleigh Police Department and DD Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huggins v. Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2014ct03288
Plaintiff:
Erik G. Huggins
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department, Bryan S. Smith, Harry Robins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunston v. Albert et al
as 5:2014ct03180
Plaintiff:
Richard Dunston, Jr.
Defendant:
E.C. Albert, S.A. Kopesak, D.W. Mead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIALS v. RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK MOSSOMMED MIALS
Defendant:
RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatley, et al v. Bowden, et al
as 5:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
Anika Hatley and Amy Hatley
Defendant:
Bowden, City of Raleigh and City of Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilcoxson v. The City of Raleigh, et al
as 5:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
Emmerli Wilcoxson
Defendant:
The City of Raleigh , Raleigh Police Department, Diana Painter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Solomon v. Raleigh Police Department
as 5:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Patrick Deon Solomon
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
James v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013ct03117
Plaintiff:
John Patrick James
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Kathrine B. Edminston, Raleigh Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
