Cases 41 - 50 of 231
Republican National Committee et al v. Virgin Islands Board of Elections et al
as 3:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee and Republican Party of the Virgin Islands
Defendant:
Virgin Islands Board of Elections and Caroline F. Fawkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mark Adams v. MI, et al
as 22-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MARY ADAMS SEMCKEN, SUSAN KAY ADAMS and others
Democratic National Committee et al v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
Democratic National Committee and Arizona Democratic Party
Defendant:
Katie Hobbs and Mark Brnovich
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Republican National Committee v. Canegata et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee
Defendant:
Mr. John Canegata, robert schanfarber, VIGOP (Virgin Islands Republican Party a/k/a VIGOP PAC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Republican National Committee v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 22-5123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Republican National Committee
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi, in her official capacity as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chair of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, Elizabeth Cheney, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Republican Senatorial Committee
DONDIEGO et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv02111
Plaintiff:
MARCIA DAY DONDIEGO, RUTHANN BAUSCH, JUDITH REED and others
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and LEIGH M. CHAPMAN
Intervenor Plaintiff:
NICK MILLER
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and JARRETT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
League of Women Voters of Florida Inc, et al v. Florida Secretary of State, et al
as 22-11143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND, INC., BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND and others
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Defendant / Appellant:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL, FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE, LAKE COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
BREVARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, DESOTO COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, FLAGLER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS and others
Manetirony Clervrain v. USA, et al
as 22-11212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Harriet Tubman Freedom Fighters Corp, et al v. Florida Secretary of State, et al
as 22-11133
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HARRIET TUBMAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS CORP., HEAD COUNT, INC., a.k.a. Headcount, PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, LEE COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BREVARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, DESOTO COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, FLAGLER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS and others
Mi Familia Vota et al v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Mi Familia Vota and Voto Latino
Defendant:
Katie Hobbs, Mark Brnovich, Larry Noble and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Living United for Change in Arizona, League of United Latin American Citizens Arizona, Arizona Students' Association and others
Petitioner:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Republican Party of Arizona and others
Intervenor:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
