Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Robert Longee v. USA
as 17-70801
Petitioner:
ROBERT GLENN LONGEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glenn v. Probate Court of Denton County et al
as 4:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Launius Robert Glenn
Defendant:
Probate Court of Denton County, Richard Douglas Ranne and Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glenn v. Probate Court of Denton County et al
as 3:2017cv00456
Petitioner:
Launius Robert Glenn
Respondent:
Probate Court of Denton County, Richard Douglas Ranne and Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miranda et al v. American Blasting Technology et al
as 4:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Lusvin Miranda and Jose Armando Rivera
Defendant:
American Blasting Technology, Robert Glenn Falke, Belinda Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Robert Danner, Jr.
as 16-17673
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT GLENN DANNER, JR.
Christopher Stoller v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 16-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
Glenn et al v. Ranne et al
as 3:2016cv03202
Plaintiff:
Launius Robert Glenn and Anita Doris Glenn
Defendant:
Richard Douglas Ranne, Wayne Keith Ranne, Donald Lee Ranne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glenn v. Methodist Charlton Medical Center
as 3:2016cv03131
Petitioner:
Launius Robert Glenn
Respondent:
Methodist Charlton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Robert Ford
as 16-6680
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT GLENN FORD
Stoller et al v. Ocwen Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09527
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller and Michael Stoller
Defendant:
Ocwen Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
