Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHOCK et al v. ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04806
Plaintiff:
CONRAD SCHOCK , TINA SCHOCK and C. S.
Defendant:
ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., WOMEN'S HEALTH AT SPARTA, NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jinright et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01849
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Jinright , Cathleen Acker , Toni Adams and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schock v. Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Schock
Defendant:
Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parham v. Schock et al
as 4:2016cv04181
Plaintiff:
James Clifford Parham
Defendant:
Marlene Schock and An Unknown State Official
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Les Trachtman vs W D Schock Corp
as 5:2016mc00025
Plaintiff:
Les Trachtman
Defendant:
W D Schock Corp
Chanel, Inc. v. ADAM STEBER et al
as 0:2016cv62987
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
ADAM STEBER, Advance Way, Alexis Christman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
USA v. William Schock
as 16-2503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ALAN SCHOCK
Frieda Aaron, et al v. Abubakar Durrani, et al
as 16-4216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIEDA AARON, KATRINA ALLEN, SHERRI LYNN ALLEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ABUBAKAR AITQ DURRANI, MD, CENTER FOR ADVANCED SPINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WEST CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Phyllis Bechtold, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-4210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHYLLIS BECHTOLD, CATHY BEIL, NANCY BEGLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
