Cases 41 - 50 of 133
Talley-Ellis v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv11121
Petitioner:
Wilshawn Talley-Ellis
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Platte #285651 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Platte #285651, Jr.
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, M. Dunham, Unknown Sutinen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sango #252200 v. Fleury et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Sango #252200
Defendant:
Timothy Fleury, Michael Eubanks, Unknown Seymorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perron #527537 v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kasey Perron
Defendant:
Warden Sarah Schroeder
Petitioner:
Kasey Perron #527537
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone #489704 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lamont Stone #489704
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, Unknown Sutinen, M. Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klingenberg et al v. Alcona Community Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv12252
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Klingenberg and B.K.
Defendant:
Alcona Community Schools Board of Education, Dan O'Connor, Chad Spitznagel and others
Gresham et al v. Alcona County Community Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv12251
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gresham, M.G., S.G. and others
Defendant:
Alcona County Community Schools Board of Education, Dan O'Connor, Chad Spitznagel and others
Burns #302423 v. Schroeder
as 2:2021cv00192
Petitioner:
Zachary Loren Burns #302423
Respondent:
Douglas R. Lloyd and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hare v. Schroeder
as 2:2021cv11744
Petitioner:
sergio Hare
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gardiner v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Gardiner #383334
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Unknown Bedient, Unknown Bergh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
