Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Sterling v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2011cv06217
Plaintiff:
Frank Sterling
Defendant:
Monroe County, Patrick J. Crough, Steven Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01509
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Rodriguez
Defendant:
The State of New York, D. Holley Carnright, Diane Lent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pimentel v. The State of New York Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Pimentel
Defendant:
The State of New York Department of Criminal Justice, Sergent Marlatt, Officer Passineao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pimentel v. The State of New York Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2011cv00284
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Pimentel
Defendant:
The State of New York Department of Criminal Justice, Sergent Marlatt, Officer Passineao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallup v. Sennett
as 1:2010cv01117
Defendant:
H. Sennett
Plaintiff:
Tani Gallup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sennett v. United States et al
as 1:2010cv01055
Plaintiff:
Laura Sennett
Defendant:
United States, Vincent Antignano, Jason K. Bryk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SENNETT v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79215
Plaintiff:
LESTER SENNETT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , DRESSER INDUSTRIES , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
