Cases 41 - 50 of 1,634
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Chevrier
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Defendant:
Gregory Chevrier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Chevrier
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Defendant:
Gregory Chevrier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Smith v. International Foundation for Electoral Systems
as 1:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ian Smith
Defendant:
International Foundation for Electoral Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jenkins v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gordon Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Cynthia J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Antwan Smith
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Happy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Standard Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Sara Smith
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McMillan v. Greene County Social Services, Child Protective Services et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Sean Travis McMillan
Defendant:
Greene County Social Services, Child Protective Services, Melissa Hicks Smith, Shyaire Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magellan Technology, Inc. et al v. Dorbes LLC. et al
as 7:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Magellan Technology, Inc. and Ecto World, LLC. doing business as Demand Vape
Defendant:
Dorbes LLC. and Christian A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
