Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,930
Amy Bryant v. William Brawley
as 24-1600
Defendant: WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D. and others
Intervenor: TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff: AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae: FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 24-2351
Plaintiff: State of Georgia, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Defendant: Miguel Cardona, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Education, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States and United States Department of Education
Amicus Curiae: Student Borrower Protection Center
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-2332
Plaintiff: State of Georgia, State of Oklahoma, State of Florida and others
Defendant: United States Department of Education, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States and Miguel Cardona, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Education
State of Alaska, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3089
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALASKA and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., President of the United States of America, in his official capacity and MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity
WV, et al v. Peter Buttigieg, et al
as 24-3560
Petitioner: STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Respondent: PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation,, SOPHIE SHULMAN, Deputy Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Amy Bryant v. Timothy Moore
as 24-1576
Defendant: PHD, FNP-BC SHARONA Y. JOHNSON, WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, JD JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board and others
Intervenor: TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff: AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NC VALUES INSTITUTE, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-3835
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: AMAZON.COM, INC.
Other: AMERICAN BOOKSELLERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Proposed Intervenor
Brown v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Defendant: State of Oklahoma and Judge Cliff Smith
Plaintiff: Matthew Jason Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Tennessee, et al v. EEOC
as 24-2249
Appellant: The Ethics & Public Policy Center
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Indiana, State of Alabama and others
Defendant: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Jane Doe, et al v. Surgeon General, State of Florida, et al
as 24-11996
Plaintiff: JANE DOE, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, GLORIA GOE, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Son, SUSAN DOE and others
Defendant: TIFFANY SIZEMORE DI PIETRO, in Her Official Capacity as Member of the Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine, NICHOLAS WILLIAM ROMANELLO, In His Official Capacity as Member of the Florida Board of Medicine, MONICA M. MORTENSEN, In Her Official Capacity as Member of the Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?