Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 544
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00005
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lessors of Abchakan Village v. Defense
as 23-1523
Appellant: LESSORS OF ABCHAKAN VILLAGE, LOGAR PROVINCE, AFGHANISTAN
Appellee: SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
MPG West, LLC v. Secretary of Defense
as 23-1430
Appellant: MPG WEST, LLC
Appellee: SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3466
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Secretary of Defense v. Pratt & Whitney
as 23-1337
Appellant: SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cross Appellant: PRATT & WHITNEY, a division of Raytheon Technologies Company
Pratt & Whitney v. Secretary of Defense
as 23-1338
Appellant: PRATT & WHITNEY, a division of Raytheon Technologies Company
Appellee: SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55998
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
WILL v. JOHN DOE AGENCY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04394
Plaintiff: HUMAN FREE WILL
Defendant: JOHN DOE AGENCY, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sigoloff v. Austin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00923
Plaintiff: Samuel Sigoloff
Defendant: Lloyd J Austin, III, United States Secretary of Defense, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vicente Borja, et al v. Scott Nago, et al
as 22-16742
Plaintiff / Appellant: VICENTE TOPASNA BORJA, EDMUND FREDERICK SCHROEDER, Jr., RAVINDER SINGH NAGI and others
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as Chief Election Officer for the Hawaii Office of Elections, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL VOTING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?