Cases 41 - 50 of 228
Howland-Bolton et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2021cv10751
Defendant:
Command Officers Unknown Metropolitan, Unknown SRT Officers, Rodney Cushionbery and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon McEvilly, Clarissa Grimes, Sara Habbo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Clark v. Doe et al
as 2:2021cv10735
Plaintiff:
Shannon Clark
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Scholtes v. Michigan Department of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Mike Shannon, Darin Mentink, Mark Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Scholtes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. WASHINGTON
as 1:2020cv13326
Petitioner:
Shannon Sherrell Phillips
Respondent:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv13018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walters et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 5:2020cv12726
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
G.W.1, LeeAnne Walters, G.W.2. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Bell et al
as 2:2020cv12331
Defendant:
Shannon Thomas, LOIS GAGNON, R.N., BEAUMONT HOSPITAL-DEARBORN and others
BELL v. BEAUMONT HOSPITAL-DEARBORN et al
as 4:2020cv12332
Defendant:
Shannon Thomas, LOIS GAGNON, R.N. and BEAUMONT HOSPITAL-DEARBORN
Plaintiff:
LLOYD BELL
Gottschall-Whiting v. Saul
as 2:2020cv12009
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Shannon Gottschall-Whiting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Griffith #165268 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon J. Griffith #165268
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
