Cases 41 - 50 of 1,008
US v. de Souza Prado
as 24-1011
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
THIAGO DE SOUZA PRADO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Souza v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., A Bermuda Company et al
as 1:2023cv24877
Plaintiff:
Shaunne Souza
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., A Bermuda Company and NCL America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Geraldo De Souza-Moreno Neto, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-14113
Petitioner:
GERALDO DE SOUZA-MORENO NETO, LAURICIA VIVIANY SOUSA-MORENO, ANTONELLA SOUSA-MORENO and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nesbitt v. Gray
as 23-1925
Petitioner / Appellant:
RALPH NESBITT
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN GRAY, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Petty v. Souza et al
as 1:2023cv00422
Defendant:
Keoni Bryant, Kevin Souza, Voltaire Gansit and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Araujo Rodrigues Souza, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3970
Petitioner:
GELSMAR ARAUJO RODRIGUES SOUZA, SARA ALVES ARAUJO D'AVILA and LUCAS GABRIEL D'AVILA ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14431
Plaintiff:
Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Evan Moore, Ewelina Dymek and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
De Souza Campos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3746
Petitioner:
DEBORA LORRAINE DE SOUZA CAMPOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
