Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Jones v. Moorjani et al
as 1:2013cv02247
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
Harish Moorjani, Sundaram Ravikumar and Mount Vernon Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sundaram v. Flagstar Bank F.S.B. et al
as 4:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
Vivek Sundaram
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank F.S.B. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Brown et al
as 4:2010cv04929
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Melissa Brown, Katpana Sundaram and William H. Alsup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Brown et al
as 4:2010cv04929
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Melissa Brown and Katpana Sundaram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv04929
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Melissa Brown and Katpana Sundaram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv04929
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Melissa Brown and Katpana Sundaram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bedonie, et al v. Singh, et al
as 1:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Teddy Bedonie and Louise Lee Bedonie
Defendant:
Sonny Singh, Gurmail Singh, TM Sundaram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hindu Temple and Community Center of Georgia, Inc. et al v. Raghunathan et al
as 1:2009cv02401
Plaintiff:
Hindu Temple and Community Center of Georgia, Inc., Hindu Temple and Community Center of Georgia, Inc., Hindu Temple and Community Center of Georgia, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Valmikinathan P. Raghunathan, Sundaram Raghunathan, Seema Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Martinez v. Sundaram
as 1:2008cv07242
Plaintiff:
Mara Martinez
Defendant:
Ravikumar Sundaram, M.D.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sundaram v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv01131
Plaintiff:
Roshni Sundaram
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Gerald Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
