Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Sims v. Downey et al
as 1:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sims
Defendant:
James A. Downey, Jr., Betsy H. Phillips, Sidney H. Kirstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. MORROW et al
as 1:2016cv00342
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
TRAVIS JOHN MORROW, CLIFFORD WILLIAM DILCORN, STIG LARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. WALMART STORE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR et al
as 1:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WALMART STORE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR, LAMAR SKELTON, D. BRAD RIELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Land et al
as 5:2015ct03110
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
E.C. Land, Thomas Asbell, Kevin Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Solomon et al
as 5:2014ct03326
Plaintiff:
James Anthony May
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, C. Rolfe, Sergeant Horten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
