Cases 41 - 50 of 319
Kelly v. Atenly et al
as 4:2022cv02915
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Atenly, T. Allen, T. Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv02719
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
T. Allen, Atenley, Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Mazen v. T. Allen
as 2:2022cv03024
Petitioner:
Frank Mazen
Respondent:
T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woullard v. Allen et al
as 3:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Woullard
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Allen, Col. Alvarez, Warden Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addison v. Transamerica Retirement
as 22-90016
Respondent:
Gloria A. Addison, Gary P. Allen, All Plaintiffs and others
Petitioner:
Transamerica Retirement Solutions, L.L.C., formerly known as Diversified Retirement Corporation
Keller v. Allen et al
as 3:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
John Glen Keller
Defendant:
T. Allen, Reynoso, Lt. Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanton v. Ekeke
as 22-40168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Grace N. Ekeke, Stephanie A. Lute, April Clark and others
Allen v. Henrico County Jail (East)
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Tobia Thomas Allen and Tobias T. Allen
Defendant:
Henrico County Jail (East)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malcolm v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Traves Malcolm
Defendant:
Donald Davis, C.O. C.L. Bedford, Sgt. Gwara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Allen
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez and Jay Christensen
Respondent:
Liz Neville, Randall L. Valteyi and All Successors in Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
