Cases 41 - 50 of 13,750
Pitts v. Herbert et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pitts
Defendant:
Angel Herbert, Burton Dunn, Vanessa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Law Offices of Erica T. Yitzhak et al v. Lambe et al
as 1:2024cv03552
Plaintiff:
The Law Offices of Erica T. Yitzhak and Erica T. Yitzhak, Esq. P.C.
Defendant:
Troy Lambe, Max Diversified Inc., Sunray Solar Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The Law Offices of Erica T. Yitzhak et al v. Lambe et al
as 2:2024cv03552
Petitioner:
The Law Offices of Erica T. Yitzhak and Erica T. Yitzhak, Esq. P.C.
Respondent:
Troy Lambe, Max Diversified Inc., Sunray Solar Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
(UD)(PS) Liu v. McIntyre et al
as 2:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Yao Liu
Defendant:
Tiffany Angelique McIntyre and Troy Lamont Finley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Andrus v. Commission of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Troy K Andrus
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
(PC) Bonilla v. Nunley et al
as 2:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Troy L. Nunley and Kendall J. Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
