Cases 41 - 50 of 756
NEUBAUER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUIRTY
as 1:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
TAMMY LYNN NEUBAUER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUIRTY and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWALD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv04625
Plaintiff:
TROY LEWALD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH HOLDINGS LLC, KIP HALLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEAVLEY HAWES v. MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE
as 2:2022cv04495
Plaintiff:
TAMMY PEAVLEY HAWES
Defendant:
MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELL et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
XAVIAR PAGAN, RONNIE E. JOHNSON, COURTNEY DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE M. LITTLE, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, DEPUTY SECRETARY TREVOR WINGARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCANULTY v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2022cv01440
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. MCANULTY
Defendant:
MELINDA ADAMS, LESLEY ANN COMO, KATHLEEN KOCHERZAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCORRY v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv03896
Plaintiff:
TAMMY JEAN MCCORRY
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Simmons v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2022cv01522
Plaintiff:
Tammy Simmons
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Francisco Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Shumaker v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Tammy Shumaker
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
