Cases 41 - 50 of 166
Lacey v. City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01427
Defendant:
Jesse Amos, City of Norfolk, Virginia and Norfolk Police Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 1:2020cv01370
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Lacey
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. City of Norfolk
as 1:2020cv01371
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Lacey
Defendant:
City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. City Of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2020cv00521
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk and City of Norfolk, Virginia
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ameer Flippin v. City of Norfolk
as 20-1855
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK, a municipality, LEANNE HARDIE, Human Services for Homelessness Coordinator, KENNETH COOPER ALEXANDER, Mayor of the City of Norfolk in an Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMEER FLIPPIN
Hardee v. Unknown
as 3:2020cv00558
Defendant:
Unknown, Norfolk City Jail, Norfolk Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flippin v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2020cv00287
Defendant:
Kenneth Cooper Alexander, Leanne Hardie, City of Norfolk and others
Plaintiff:
Ameer Flippin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zembower v. City of Norfolk
as 3:2020cv00386
Petitioner:
Joshua Alan Zembower
Respondent:
City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riddick, Jr. v. City of Norfolk
as 2:2020cv00165
Plaintiff:
Herman B Riddick, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Glover v. The City of Norfolk
as 20-1169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMOTHY B. PRIDEMORE and DAVID I. GLOVER
Defendant:
RICHARD J. HRYNIEWICH
Defendant / Appellant:
THE CITY OF NORFOLK
3Rd Party Defendant:
SAFE BOATS INTERNATIONAL, LLC and WILLARD MARINE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
