Cases 41 - 50 of 1,027
Bucks County Court of Common Pleas v. Curtis Smith, Jr., et al
as 23-2662
Plaintiff:
BUCKS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Defendant / Appellant:
CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
Andrew GinesIn re: Andrew Gines
as 23-2644
Petitioner:
In re: ANDREW GINES
Respondent:
DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Worman v. Barasse,Esq et al
as 3:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Worman
Defendant:
Nancy Barasse,Esq, John Henry "Shane" Scanlon,Esq, Ruth Borland,Esq and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
VURIMINDI v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2023cv03282
Petitioner:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Respondent:
ERIN MORGAN, PHILADELPHIA ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson
Defendant:
United States, Middle District of Pennsylvania, Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E. Scarborough, III v. Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, et al
as 23-2414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Thomas WashamIn re: Thomas Washam
as 23-2264
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS WASHAM
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Walker v. The County of Cuyahoga, Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv03124
Plaintiff:
Carl Walker
Defendant:
The County of Cuyahoga, Ohio, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas and Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judge Jose A. Villanueva
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3575
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
