Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 788
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Neese v. MSPB
as 23-1408
Petitioner: ASHLEY B. NEESE
Respondent: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Martin Andersen v. MSPB
as 23-1049
Petitioner: MARTIN EDWIN ANDERSEN
Respondent: U. S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Michelle Honse v. MSPB
as 23-55023
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHELLE CHRISTIAN HONSE
Defendant / Appellee: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Maria Esparraguera v. Department of the Army, et al
as 23-5002
Plaintiff / Appellant: Maria Esparraguera
Defendant / Appellee: Department of the Army, Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army, Gabe Camarillo, Under Secretary of the Army and others
MILLER v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff: ROBERT M. MILLER
Defendant: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and CATHY A. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Holmes v. Merit System Protection Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00364
Petitioner: Sherman Holmes
Defendant: Merit System Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Payne v. MSPB
as 23-1231
Petitioner: JOSEPH C. PAYNE
Respondent: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Anthony Perry v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 22-5319
Petitioner / Appellant: Anthony W. Perry
Defendant / Appellee: Gina Raimondo, United States Secretary of Commerce, Merit Systems Protection Board, Brian Digiacomo, Professional and Individual Capacity, United States Department of Commerce and others
Scott v. MSPB
as 23-1134
Petitioner: LAJUANNA R. SCOTT
Respondent: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?