Cases 41 - 50 of 295
Gannon et al v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv11914
Plaintiff:
Paul Gannon and People Driven Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Presidio, Inc., Presidio Networked Solutions LLC and Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
People of the State of Michigan v. Verellen
as 2:2022cv11865
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
Nathaniel Brian Verellen
Lee v. Christiansen
as 2:2022cv11700
Petitioner:
Willie Alshauna Lee
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan and John Christiansen
Hatton et al v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv11564
Plaintiff:
David Hatton, Ryan Heidenreich and People Driven Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Presidio, Inc., Presidio Networked Solutions LLC and Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Groulx v. People's Republic of China (PRC)
as 1:2022cv11369
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Defendant:
People's Republic of China (PRC)
Lewis v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2022cv11383
Petitioner:
Floyd A. Lewis
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Lay v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2022cv11095
Petitioner:
Reggie Lamour Lay
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Scheker et al v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10674
Plaintiff:
Alexandro A. Scheker and People Driven Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Presidio, Inc., Presidio Networked Solutions, LLC and Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kraft v. People Helping People of Pullman, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Kraft
Defendant:
People Helping People of Pullman, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.