Cases 41 - 50 of 15,168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singh v. Garland
as 24-2087
Petitioner:
PARAMJEET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Jimenez v. Garland
as 24-2079
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
SANDRA NOHEMY ROJAS MEJIA, JOSE ALFREDO RAMOS JIMENEZ and J. A. R.
Ahmed v. Garland
as 24-2091
Petitioner:
RIDOIY AHMED
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
John HallIn re: John Hall
as 24-2448
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN D. HALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Hollis v. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency et al
as 4:2024cv00669
Defendant:
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, United States Attorney and United States Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ray Hollis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rickerson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00127
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Rachel Rickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05485
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
