Cases 41 - 50 of 9,001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00790
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AL SAADAWI v. USCIS - Houston District Office et al
as 4:2024cv03423
Plaintiff:
AHMED AL SAADAWI
Defendant:
Alamdar Hamadani, District Director USCIS - Houston District Office and DIRECTOR USCIS UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Layer v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00674
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Plaintiff:
Shanshan Liu Layer
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sultana v. Garland et al
as 7:2024cv06918
Defendant:
Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Ambassador Peter Haas, Merrick B. Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Shafin Sultana
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
