Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00941
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Romo Vejar v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00915
Plaintiff:
Jesus R Romo Vejar
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Torres-Lopez et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Javier Torres-Lopez , Ramiro Estrada-Morales , Armando Penaloza-Vejar and others
Defendant:
Bruce Scott , David Field , Ronnie Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Torres-Lopez vs. Dallam County
as 2:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Javier Torres-Lopez , Ramiro Estrada-Morales , Armando Penaloza-Vejar and others
Defendant:
Dallam County, David Fields, Bruce Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chanel, Inc. v. Vejar et al
as 4:2012cv02684
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Argelia Serrato Vejar, Argel Enterprises, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Joyce Hicks v. Nevada Dept of Corrections, et al
as 12-16517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES COX, Director of N.D.O.C., SHERYL FOSTER, Assistant Director of N.D.O.C. and others
Hicks v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00666
Defendant:
James Cox, Sheryl Foster, J. Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ebaribaldo Vejar v. California Department of Correction et al
as 2:2011cv09372
Respondent:
California Department of Correction, Brenda Cash and CO S Nguyen
Petitioner:
Ebaribaldo Vejar
Ramon Lopez-Vejar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-73947
Petitioner:
RAMON LOPEZ-VEJAR, AKA Ray Lopez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
