Cases 41 - 50 of 2,214
James v. Abraham et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
Lt. W/F Abraham, Doctor PA Wood, Doctor PA Burishman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sites v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00166
Petitioner:
Jamie W. Sites
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boyd v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Chuck W. Boyd
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Welch v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Sean W. Welch
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tasker et al v. Black Rock Wind Force, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Tasker, Betty J. Tasker and David W. Tasker
Defendant:
Black Rock Wind Force, LLC and Clearway Energy Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Braden v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ezra W. Braden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hairston v. McGuire
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert David Hairston
Defendant:
Officer W. W. McGuire, R. S. Dyson, Sgt. C. C. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
as 5:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Hanna
Respondent:
FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roberts v. Maston et al
as 2:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Bennie Ray Roberts
Respondent:
Russell Maston, Brad Douglas, W. J. Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanna v. FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
as 5:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Hanna
Respondent:
FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
