Cases 41 - 50 of 897
Coram v. Aycock et al
as 5:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Constance B. Coram
Defendant:
Barbara Aycock, Freeman Hardison, Wayne Aycock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
DURHAM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Wimberley v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Wayne Wimberley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Graham v. Wayne County Sheriff et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Graham
Defendant:
Wayne County Sheriff and A. D. Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00791
Petitioner:
BRUCE WAYNE JONES, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MURPHY v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGETT v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. HARGETT
Defendant:
AMY COLLINS, NORMA BLACKSHEAR, WAYNE BRATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, WARDEN BRAY and MARK WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Craig Wayne Simpson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wayne Reynolds
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
