Cases 41 - 50 of 621
White v. Daniels et al
as 5:2023ct03172
Plaintiff:
Camell D. White
Defendant:
Captain John Daniels and Warden John Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. King et al
as 7:2023cv01047
Defendant:
THE HARPER CORPORATION - GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CHARLES B KING and HARPER BUILDERS
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE L TAYLOR
3Rd Party Defendant:
Stephanie M White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROWN v. McFadden et al
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
LEKISHA BROWN
Defendant:
Gary L. McFadden, Telisa E. White, Lisa Suddreth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Meyers v. Alexander Correctional Institute Wardens et al
as 5:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
John Does, FNU Byrd, Billy Bob Thorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Russell White
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
WHITE v. CHALQ, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
ALEX WHITE
Defendant:
CHALQ, INC., GABE HILL and AUSTIN DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
White v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michelle White
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
White v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
James White
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
WHITE v. WELLPATH LLC
as 1:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Rebecca White
Defendant:
WELLPATH LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
