Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Montgomery v. Sailor
as 1:2018cv02425
Defendant:
Kevin Sailor
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv05518
Defendant:
Barbara Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc., Bay Area Toll Authority, Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montgomery et al v. Gosselin
as 1:2018cv02283
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery and David Montgomery
Defendant:
Matthew Gosselin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs et al v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2018cv02684
Plaintiff:
Taja Collier, Deshawn Briggs, Mark Pascale and others
Defendant:
Treatment Assessment Screening Center Incorporated, William Montgomery and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv02613
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Veshi, Elisa Ramunno and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Brewer Jr et al
as 3:2018cv01845
Defendant:
William Brewer Jr, Wayne Brewer, M Williams Jr and others
Plaintiff:
George William Montgomery, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Falkenberg v. Williams Montgomery & John Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv03972
Defendant:
Williams Montgomery & John Ltd., C. Barry Montgomery, Michael Bruck and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas F Falkenberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Channel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Channel, Sr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taebel v. Montgomery
as 2:2018cv01354
Petitioner:
Mitch Taebel
Respondent:
William Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montgomery et al v. Irwin et al
as 1:2018cv00694
Plaintiff:
David Montgomery and William Montgomery
Defendant:
David Irwin, Rhonda Peckham and Kristin Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
