Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Ramos et al v. Conway et al
as 6:2012cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jovanny Diaz Ramos , Jose Alberto Ramirez and Javier Enriquez Castillo
Defendant:
Jacqueline S Conway, Hartt Transportation Systems Inc and CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Barhight et al v. Curtis et al
as 3:2011cv02167
Plaintiff:
Margaret A. Barhight and August Barhight
Defendant:
Lloyd M. Curtis and Hartt Transportation Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amadeo v. Hartt Transportation System, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01346
Plaintiff:
Roberto Amadeo
Defendant:
Hartt Transportation System, Inc. and Norma J. Ambrose, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HARTT v. FLAGSHIP CREDIT CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00822
Plaintiff:
GLYNN HARTT
Defendant:
FLAGSHIP CREDIT CORPORATION
Counter_claimant:
FLAGSHIP CREDIT CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
GLYNN HARTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR SECRETARY v. HARTT et al
as 1:2009cv00620
Plaintiff:
LABOR, US SEC
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARTT, NORTHERN LOG HOMES INC and NORTHERN LOG HOMES SIMPLE IRA PLAN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONNOLLY et al v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
ERNST & YOUNG LLP, KATHRYN A. OBERLY, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
