Cases 41 - 50 of 49,172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff:
SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
C.M. v. DAVIDSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
C.M.
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ERIC R. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
George v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. George
Defendant:
Sergeant Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Parker v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Limited Partnership
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. PARKER and PATRICE PARKER
Intervenor:
ALICE MEJIA
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, Limited Partnership and NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Yanez v. Walker et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tammy Yanez
Defendant:
Christine Walker, Crystal Caruso-Wilson, Sara Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frederick v. Propst et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michel Frederick
Defendant:
Jon Propst and City of Lincolnton, NC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
